Handles huge datasets (n)
Option | Description |
---|---|
Yes | Scales smoothly to arbitrarily large n without fundamental changes. |
Most do | Works for large n with most method declinations but may need optimization. |
Most don't | Only a few variants or implementations of the method can handle large n. |
No | Breaks down or becomes computationally infeasible when n grows. |
Definition
The method’s scalability to very large datasets, indicating if it remains computationally and statistically tractable as sample size n grows.
Explanation
Big‑data settings present both opportunity and challenge for detection and attribution: scalable algorithms can leverage high resolution or massive sensor networks, but some methods become infeasible or lose interpretability at scale. Knowing which methods handle large n informs decisions about algorithmic implementations and resource needs.
Tools/rationale for helping assessment
Depending on the number of samples available in the case study, the user estimates if this aspect is important to consider when filtering methods.
Example
A biogeographer wants to process 3 million 10 m Sentinel-2 pixels; only a distributed causal random-forest implementation would complete in hours, whereas a full Bayesian SEM fails beyond ~10 000 pixels, so Yes
is selected.